Western world and the myth of the Indian middle class

Whenever I hear Europeans per se Indian equivalent of foreigners talking about the Indian middle class’ I often wonder what do they mean? What section of the Indian society are they referring to?

Are they referring to the conventional wisdom consisting of the 601 million odd consumer class, or the few 100 million people with the ability to afford their luxuries? Or the ones who earn an equivalent of US 2$ a day according to 1993’s paltry statistics?

Hamara Bajaj
Ailaa! Helmet?


The clamour of the economic reforms and the European statistics has been focused on these groups which seem sociological but is not entirely logical. The fact is that the rise of the new middle class in India- drives and makes things happen in an uninhibited, pragmatic and amoral fashion. They also comprise of an exploding consumer market which is best of described as the “bird of gold” or the potential gold mine waiting to be tapped.

However what has never been completely clear is the size of India’s middle class.

In the present times, the Indian middle class is a ripe target for international brands. This is reflected from the overflowing advertisements of the foreign products on television(s) or glossy magazines. Brands ranging from Ray-ban to Armani, Nike to Bata, Hindustan Unilever to Vicco Vajradanti(s), Trump’s Fair & Lovely gamble to Anti- Head & Shoulders. Even the car companies are aiming to target the consumer laden class with their ‘Nano’ sized products to sedan looking Dzires. This is why there is a rush for endorsing sportspersons to attract youngsters. Remember the publicity stunt by Manyavar with Virat and Anushka?

I remember the time when Mohd. Azharuddin (former Indian cricket captain) had endorsed Nike footwear. This had sparked off an unintended controversy- that a name resembling the Prophet cannot adorn a lowly item as a footwear.

Even the alcoholic brands ranging from Kingfisher (*United breweries) to Tuborg started selling their pun intended water bottles, and Bacardi the music CDs (be what you want to be). It is said that more bottles of Johnny Walker Black Label are sold in India than they are distilled in Scotland.

However, the international brands have received a dismayed response from the Indian market. The primary reason being that the Indian middle class is not as cracked up as it seems from the economic point of view. Prima facie the state is indispensable to most people and is unable to provide vital requirements like- physical security, law, infrastructure and basic amenities. Although the country has grown exponentially since 1991, the facilities still seem to lack, are unreliable or dilapidated.

Ironically, amongst the 600 million consumers, barely 100 million or less are able to afford the luxuries of basic material consumption such as the shampoos by Proctor & Gamble. I agree that the said consumer base does purchase basic goods but they are cheaper than the products of the multinational companies. If you are selling tea, coffee, hair oil or fairness creams and plastic buckets, then you definitely stand a chance in India’s ever-expanding consumer base. A fine example of the same would be- “the Red-Mi mobile phones, the mother friendly slippers, the flowery t-shirts, Tupperware lunch boxes (banned in the U.S.A.) and the clinically failed generic medicines”.   

Why didn’t I mention sports shoes? Because the majority of the people in the said class barely earn money half the price of the Nike shoes.

It’s not that Indians are not buying anything. You endorse a white model in an advertisement and make him speak in Hindi “sasta nahi sabse achcha” (Not just cheap but the best), the commonwealth mind-set will suddenly kick in, giving them a high even Bob Marley didn’t get.

From the pre-liberalisation era (pre-1991) there has been indefinite growth. Bicycles have become too common in Indian rural areas, whereas the houses made of mud and hatch are becoming pukka these days.

The television ownership is rising, Republic is not an ideology anymore but a news channel. “Swaraj” is not an aim but a foreign minister, “Chillar” is not a penny but Miss World (with all due respect). India has an ever-growing base, but what they consume and how much can they afford to pay is another matter altogether. One thing which is actually changing at a steady rate is our indifference to the global brand(s). But will it last?

The change is peculiar in nature which probably even Chinese cannot comprehend. We require I-phone X but we need our kidneys too. The economic transformation of India since liberalisation is real but it will be a while until our middle class can afford an apple or an erstwhile Blackberry product altogether.

The composition and character of the new Indian middle class is indeed unique because it now has people who are typically not considered to be belonging to the middle class. Hence, the middle class has become the new “status marker” or the “status quo” where the poor aspire to in a status-conscious society.

– by boringbug

Boringbug is a self-proclaimed blogger who writes for the purpose of sharing. Juggling in between his professional and personal vanities he regulates his blogs with the hope of achieving tranquillity. He can be reached at- www.boringbug.com 

1 thought on “Western world and the myth of the Indian middle class

  1. Great poet! Nice insights and perspectives!

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this:
search previous next tag category expand menu location phone mail time cart zoom edit close